When does the suffering stop?

In the United States, survivors of childhood sex abuse are told to speak up, to come forward, and to report the crimes committed against them. They are assured by public service announcements, nonprofit organizations, and even law enforcement agencies themselves that justice will be served — that their voices will be heard. But behind the slogans and the sympathetic headlines lies a darker, more disturbing truth: many of these survivors are revictimized not by their abusers, but by the very system that claims to protect them.

Across the country, police departments refuse to take formal reports. District attorneys broker plea deals with serial pedophiles. Judges hand down lenient sentences that send predators back into communities where they once hunted children, sometimes within months. Meanwhile, survivors are retraumatized, silenced, and sidelined in a legal process that seems rigged from the start.

The First Betrayal: Police Refusal to Take Reports

For countless survivors, the journey to justice begins, and ends, at the police station.

“I walked into the precinct with every ounce of courage I had,” says Jennifer, a survivor who reported her abuse 20 years after it occurred. “I was prepared to tell everything. But the officer on duty told me it was too long ago. He said it wouldn’t go anywhere.”

Jennifer's story is not unique. Advocates report that police officers across multiple jurisdictions routinely dismiss or ignore reports of childhood sex abuse, particularly if the abuse occurred years or decades earlier. Despite changes in statutes of limitations in many states, frontline law enforcement officers often lack training or the will to pursue historical sex abuse claims.

“They act like if it’s not a recent crime, it’s not worth their time,” says Carl Dunne, a former detective turned victims’ advocate. “But what they don’t understand is that delayed disclosure is the norm in these cases. Survivors come forward when they’re ready, and when they feel safe. And we’re failing them the moment they do.”

Some officers even misinform victims, intentionally or through ignorance, telling them they have no legal recourse or that their cases are too “complicated” to investigate. In many cases, victims are never given the opportunity to file a formal report. The abuse is never documented, the predator never named, and the first door to justice remains locked.

The Prosecutors’ Bargain: Justice for Sale

Even when victims manage to get a case on the record, they often find the next gatekeeper, the district attorney, just as unwilling to fight for them.

Instead of prosecuting child sex abusers to the fullest extent of the law, many DAs seek quick wins and negotiated outcomes. In practice, this means plea bargains. In theory, plea deals save time and spare victims from the trauma of testifying. But in reality, they often short-circuit justice entirely.

David Martinez, now 42, was one of more than a dozen boys abused by a volunteer youth pastor in rural Texas. His abuser was arrested in 2020 after new evidence surfaced. But despite multiple victims and a mountain of corroborating testimony, the DA offered a plea deal that reduced the charges from multiple counts of aggravated sexual assault of a minor to one count of indecency with a child, a charge that carried no jail time, only probation.

“We were devastated,” says David. “They called it a ‘strategic compromise.’ I call it a betrayal.”

Why would prosecutors agree to such lenient terms? According to insiders, it’s a mix of politics, pragmatism, and pressure. “Sex abuse trials are messy,” says a former assistant DA who spoke on condition of anonymity. “They take time. They’re emotionally draining. Juries are unpredictable. And sometimes the higher-ups just don’t want that kind of smoke.”

In some cases, prosecutors quietly argue that avoiding a trial spares victims more pain. But victims themselves often feel differently. “We don’t want to be protected from the truth,” says Rachel, a 30-year-old survivor. “We want it heard. We want accountability. We want these predators off the streets. Isn’t that the job?”

Judges and Light Sentences: The Final Injustice

If the police don’t block the path to justice, and if prosecutors manage to bring a case forward, victims often face their final heartbreak in the courtroom itself.

Judges wield extraordinary discretion in sentencing, and when it comes to child sex crimes, their decisions are often shockingly lenient. In many cases, convicted pedophiles receive suspended sentences, short county jail terms, or even house arrest, often under the justification that the offender “shows remorse” or “has no prior criminal record.”

One high-profile example: In 2021, a Louisiana man was convicted of sexually abusing two minors over the course of four years. The judge sentenced him to five years — then immediately suspended all but six months of the sentence, citing the defendant’s "good standing in the community."

The community in question included one of the victim’s families. “We watched him walk out of that courtroom like he had just paid a traffic ticket,” said the victim’s father. “That’s not justice. That’s a green light for every other predator.”

Judicial discretion is supposed to ensure fairness. But critics argue that it frequently results in the opposite, particularly when the perpetrator is affluent, white, or connected to institutions like churches, schools, or nonprofits.

“There’s a pattern,” says Michelle Rivera, a legal analyst who has reviewed hundreds of sentencing records. “We see leniency when the predator is seen as ‘redeemable.’ The system sympathizes more with the criminal than the victim. And that tells victims everything they need to know: you don’t matter.”

A System Built to Fail

The cumulative effect of these failures; law enforcement refusals, prosecutorial deals, and judicial leniency is that childhood sex abuse survivors are forced to relive their trauma not just once, but many times. They are asked to share the darkest moments of their lives, only to see their courage rewarded with indifference, compromise, or silence.

It’s not just demoralizing, it’s dangerous.

According to data from the U.S. Department of Justice, most child sex offenders are serial abusers. Failing to prosecute even one case can leave countless other children at risk. And when survivors are shut out of the system, they are less likely to report future abuse or encourage others to come forward.

“Revictimization is a silent epidemic,” says Richard Windmann, president of Survivors of Childhood Sex Abuse (SCSA). “It happens in precincts, courtrooms, and DA’s offices every single day. And it’s one of the reasons so many survivors lose hope. Some take their own lives. Others disappear into addiction or poverty. And all of it could be prevented if we just did our jobs.”

What Needs to Change

Advocates and survivors alike are calling for sweeping reforms.

They want mandatory training for police officers on handling historical abuse cases. They want independent oversight of DA offices that engage in excessive plea bargaining. They want sentencing guidelines that reflect the gravity of sex crimes against children and judges who enforce them with integrity.

Most importantly, they want to be believed. To be taken seriously. To be treated not as inconvenient footnotes to the criminal process, but as human beings with rights, with dignity, and with a story that deserves justice.

“Every time I see my abuser’s face in town, free and smiling, I think: this is the best we could do?” says Jennifer. “It wasn’t. It still isn’t. But it could be.”

Until then, the scars of abuse are deepened not just by the hands of predators, but by the institutions that were supposed to protect the innocent and punish the guilty.

Editor's note: If you or someone you know is a victim of childhood sex abuse, contact Survivors of Childhood Sex Abuse (SCSA) at 469-275-1439 or visit us at http://www.scsaorg.org. You are not alone. You are not forgotten. And your voice matters.

About the Author: Luke Wiersma was sexually abused by an adult from the ages of sixteen to eighteen, two to three times a week, sometimes more. His abuser would drugged him, held him down, and raped him. Since 2021, when he shared his story for the very first time, he became a fierce Advocate for children and survivors. One of his goals is to change the laws to create harsher punishments for sex offenders, as well as protect the children of today. Luke can be reached at [email protected].

The free reprint, distribution, dissemination, promulgation and/or sharing of this article, in its whole, by anyone, is not only allowed, but is encouraged.